image courtesy:https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiKbUP4vlZswCJ0OAeInswtZSGOT6ag7RQkUI6VEdhumV4DlgFE682HQ1tjN4-cHy1197gmZ2qlnu4bxmmAbZr4hG6GdNzJc4JZNGT2yjIxOJ_fIDcAUt3NjNXP5vFCD-LuB541h0hBeiOd/s1600/Trends.jpg
It’s
an interesting pointer that can be deliberated but never decided with a Boolean
yes/no response. Waterfall is the conventional methodology and given Agile’s
merits it’s too attractive to make an immediate shift but one should reason
with the ramification by balancing the pros and cons as agile may not be an
ideal fitment for every project. Accepted Agile has made great strides but has
it replaced waterfall altogether is subjective if we are mindful of the
consequences. We learn by experience and the takeaway in the form of teaching
is to beware and be cautious of concerns.
Usually technical heads mull over the decision by studying requirements
again and again to arrive at a conclusion.
They
are both project management methodologies and the applicability rest on many
factors. Just because waterfall has been
around for long doesn't make it indispensable and agile emerging much later is
the most happening either. That’s why approach adopted should be strictly on
merits. It’s a no-brainer the discussion about this subject would entail into PMP® or PRINCE2 certification.
Waterfall
methodology is most easily identified with PMP® certification program, while PRINCE2
follows Agile. Both these approaches are very different and hence the
deliberation before deciding on picking the best suiting the needs.
Waterfall is a typical plan – build – test –deliver stages,
where the final version is envisioned in the planning phase rendering the
requirement study and scope as very critical and any change addressed through
change requirement and the customer gets to have a feel at the UAT stage only,
when all is done and set to go.
Agile is very modular, implemented through scrum, wherein the
client acts as one of the stakeholders and can know first-hand the output of a
phase technically referred as ‘sprint’ and every requirement is detailed as a
story card with scrum-master manning the post. The individual accountability is
very high. The sprint demo can be shown to client for feedback and changes
incorporated and hence the process is iterative. This flexibility is found wanting in waterfall methodology.
Lets study the popular or most searched words using Google
Trends, and though a
ballpark and not a scientific proposition, it does offer a a bird’s view.perspective as to
where the world is heading towards.
The PMP® certification seems to have picked up and peaked and gradually
slides down with the forecast trending upwards, while Agile at one stage seems
to have spiked over PMP® and continued to ascent, and the forecast too is
favorable.
The certification
aspect witnessed PMP® on the rise and peaking only to slip down and forecast is
forward, while Agile is steady with not much of growth nor stunted and the
forecast is trending upwards.
The charts are based
on ‘keyword’ search and need not necessarily endorse any claim not be evident
of any outcome. Like stressed earlier they present a picture of the trends and
such PMP® is still quite popular, and Agile is holding on and growing.
So what do you think
is the trend? Do let us know….
No comments:
Post a Comment