Records
reveal that 90% of the productive time engaged by Project Managers is on
communication. The PMI’s 2013 Pulse of the Profession report states that effective
communications to all stakeholders as the most critical in project
management.
The report
further cautioned about the high risks due to poor communication, which is a shocking
figure of 56% percentage.
One of the
reason attributed to this rise in risk is the negligence to proper communication
as project managers, at times, tend to take it for granted. Communication during the inception, especially
about requirement walk-through can prove critical and impact the outcome of the
project. It’s important all the stakeholders well informed and educated about
the expectations. Capturing the requirement correctly – usually exchanging
notes and drawings or prototype – is again typical communication management. If
the start is good, it’s as good half the battle won. Most of the failures when
analyzed point to the requirement analysis when the customer and vendor’
understanding failed to match. Furthermore,
effective communications prove to be main reason(s) for successful execution of
projects by meeting deadlines with some delay and at cost. It spells top
performance of all the stakeholders. For the scope of this article, let’s look at key aspects that stress the
need for effective communication in a business project.
Understanding stakeholders’
expectation: it’s
easy to misread as ‘requirements’. Stakeholders always have an expectation as
to how the project should evolve and shape up. It will be difficult to gauge
the expectation in the first call and hence it’s iterative. The back and forth
exchange is a necessity till all involved are able to read and interpret the
message in voice – unanimous. The objectives
agreeable mutually should be engaged as the mission of the project.
Risk Mitigation: Any undertaking will have its share
of risks. Black and white is almost picture perfect. There will be some grey
area, which is expected in a business engagement. . When the communication is
free and frequent, chances are good in ironing out the difference and closing
the gaps. The worst of risks are the assumptions made in the absence of valid
or required information. Correspondence between different stakeholders will cut
down the clutter and enhance understanding. The better the understanding,
lesser will be the assumptions. Assumptions
are inevitable, but efforts should be made to keep it to the minimum with least
impact.
Transparency leads to trust. Communication helps to earn the
stakeholders confidence. Much depends on the matter and manner which is being communicated
and the manner. Its time bound and information critical to build a good rapport
in order to build credibility. When there is nothing to hide, why will be the
need to doubt? Open and transparent communication always clear results in garnering
goodwill and establishing trustworthiness. An honest response that conveys an
unpleasant message might be difficult to savor but that’s how integrity is
build. Trust deficit or erosion can create serious conflicts in slowing or
stopping project. On the other hand, earning stakeholders’ confidence will help
in better understanding within both the parties to allow some leeway or
latitude. All said and done, it boils to the trust – how reliable you are, and
more importantly, truthful.
Precise and concise communication. Prompt, punctual and proper exchange
of information using appropriate channels defines communication. How many actually acknowledge a mail receipt –
though it’s the best way to assure. It doesn’t
need to be rich in prose or sound poetic – a simple message using simple language
is enough as long it communicates the required and desired information. Besides,
stakeholders, especially decision makers are always short of time and may not
be read the length of the letter. Hence it’s recommended to keep it precise and
to the point.
Regular and frequent communication. It’s never construed as disturbance
when it comes to the messages affecting the commitment. Free and forthcoming communication
that’s scheduled or unscheduled is always welcome and never understood as an intrusion
specifically about project updates. The daily status report, weekly status
report and similar reports are scheduled ones that are expected. And any
alerts, warning or clarification exchanges are unplanned or unscheduled. Frequent
communication will help in project navigation and better understanding of the actual
progress made as accountable stakeholders will confirm or raise flags as
concern to undertake remedial measures, if required.
Communication
Management features as one the knowledge areas in PMI’s PMBOK® A Guide to the
Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). If you have a comment,
please drop by and we can discuss it further.
We are one
of the leading educational service provider offering project management
programs as part of niche certification courses. In case
you are interested to know more about our programs, please visit our website www.icertglobal.com
No comments:
Post a Comment